Tuberc Respir Dis > Volume 59(4); 2005 > Article
Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases 2005;59(4):374-379.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2005.59.4.374    Published online October 1, 2005.
Importance of Carbon Monoxide Transfer Coefficient (KCO) Interpretation in Patients with Airflow Limitation.
Yong Woo Seo, Won Il Choi, Jeong Eun Lee, Hun Pyo Park, Sung Min Ko, Kyoung Sook Won, Dong Yoon Keum, Mi Young Lee, Young June Jeon
1Departments of Medicine, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea. wichoi@dsmc.or.kr
2Departments of Radiology, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
3Departments of Nuclear Medicine, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
4Departments of Thoracic Surgery, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
5Departments of Preventive Medicine, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The single-breath carbon monoxide diffusion capacity (DLCO) and the per unit alveolar volume (KCO; DLCO/VA) gave discordant values when there was an abnormal alveolar volume (VA). However, the clinical significance of the discordant values in patients with airflow limitation has not been examined. This study investigated the DLCO and KCO changes after improving the airflow limitation. METHOD: The baseline DLCO and KCO with lung volume were measured in patients with an airflow obstruction. The effective alveolar volume was measured using the single-breath CH4 dilution method. The patients divided into two groups according to the baseline values: (1) increased KCO in comparison with the DLCO (high discordance) (2) decreased or not increased KCO in comparison with the DLCO (low discordance). The diffusion capacity and lung volume were measured after treatment. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the baseline lung volumes including the FEV1 and FVC between the two groups. The FEV1 and FVC were significantly increased in the high discordance group compared with the low discordance group after treating the airflow limitation. The DLCO and alveolar volume were significant higher in the high discordance group compared with the low discordance group while the TLC was not. CONCLUSION: The discordance between the DLCO and KCO could be translated into an airflow reversibility in patients with an airflow limitation
Key Words: DLCO, KCO, Pulmonary function test, Obstructive lung disease


ABOUT
ARTICLE & TOPICS
Article category

Browse all articles >

Topics

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
101-605, 58, Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu (Seocho-dong, Seocho Art-Xi), Seoul 06652, Korea
Tel: +82-2-575-3825, +82-2-576-5347    Fax: +82-2-572-6683    E-mail: katrdsubmit@lungkorea.org                

Copyright © 2024 by The Korean Academy of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases. All rights reserved.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next