Tuberc Respir Dis > Volume 44(4); 1997 > Article
Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases 1997;44(4):853-860.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.1997.44.4.853    Published online August 1, 1997.
Methacholine Responsiveness of Bronchial and Extrathoracic Airway in Patients with Chronic Cough.
Jae Jeong Shim, Je Hyeong Kim, Sung Yong Lee, Young Hwan Kwan, So Ra Lee, Sang Yeub Lee, Jung Kyung Suh, Jae Youn Cho, Kwang Ho In, Se Hwa Yoo, Kyung Ho Kang
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Chronic cough, defined as a cough persisting for three weeks or longer, Is a common symptom for which outpatient care is sought. The most common etiologies of chronic cough are postnasal drip, asthma, arid gastroesophageal reflux. Methacholine challenge is a useful diagnostic study in the evaulation of chronic cough, particularly useful in chronic cough patients with asthmatic symptom. Patients with chronic cough may have dysfunction of bronchial and extrathoracic airways. To evaluate if dysfunction of the bronchial and extrathoracic airways causes chronic cough, we assessed bronchial (BHR) and extrathoracic airway (EAHR) responsiveness to inhaled methacholine in patients with chronic cough. METHODS: 111patients with chronic cough were enrolled in our study. Enrolled patients had no recorded diagnosis of asthma bronchopulmonary disease, hypertension, heart disease or systemic disease and no current treatment with bronchodilator or corticosteroid. Enrolled patients consisted of 46 patients with cough alone, 24 patieots with wheeze 22 patients with dyspnea; 19 patients with wheeze and dyspnea. The inhaled methacholine concentrations causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (PC20FEV1,) and 25% fall in n axiital midinspiratory flow (PC25MIF50) were used as bronchial and extrathoracic hyperrespornsiveness. RESULTS: There were four response patterns to methacholine challenge study HEIR in 27 patients, EAHR in 16 patients, combined BHR and EAHR in S patients, and no hyperresponsiveness in 60 patients. In patients with cough alone, there were BHR in 3 patients, EAHR in 9 patients, and combined BI-IR and EAHR in 2 patients. In patients with wheeze and/or dyspnea, there were BHR in 24 patients, EAHR in 7 patients, and BHR and EAHR in 6 patients. Compared with patients with wheeze and/or dyspnea, patients with cough alone had more common EAHR than BHR. In patients with wheeze mad/or dyspnea, BHR was more common than EAHR. CONCLUSION: These results show tint among patients with hyperresponsiveness to methacholine, those with dyspnea and/or wheezing had mainly bronchial hyperresponsiveness, whereas those with chronic cough alone had mainly extrathoracic airway hyperresponsiveness.
Key Words: Chronic cough, Airway hyperresponsiveness


ABOUT
ARTICLE & TOPICS
Article category

Browse all articles >

Topics

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
101-605, 58, Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu (Seocho-dong, Seocho Art-Xi), Seoul 06652, Korea
Tel: +82-2-575-3825, +82-2-576-5347    Fax: +82-2-572-6683    E-mail: katrdsubmit@lungkorea.org                

Copyright © 2024 by The Korean Academy of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases. All rights reserved.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next