Tuberc Respir Dis > Volume 86(2); 2023 > Article
Kim, Choi, and Lee: Host Blood Transcriptional Signatures as Candidate Biomarkers for Predicting Progression to Active Tuberculosis


A recent understanding of the dynamic continuous spectrum of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection has led to the recognition of incipient tuberculosis, which refers to the latent infection state that has begun to progress to active tuberculosis. The importance of early detection of these individuals with a high-risk of progression to active tuberculosis is emphasized to efficiently implement targeted tuberculosis preventive therapy. However, the tuberculin skin test or interferon-γ release assay, which is currently used for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection, does not aid in the prediction of the risk of progression to active tuberculosis. Thus, a novel test is urgently needed. Recently, simultaneous and systematic analysis of differentially expressed genes using a high-throughput platform has enabled the discovery of key genes that may serve potential biomarkers for the diagnosis or prognosis of diseases. This host transcriptional investigation has been extended to the field of tuberculosis, providing promising results. The present review focuses on recent progress and challenges in the field of blood transcriptional signatures to predict progression to active tuberculosis.

Key Figure


Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB), which has coexisted with human for thousands of years [1] and causes tuberculosis (TB), remains an unresolved global health challenge [2,3]. According to the 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) Global TB Report, 2020 milestones of the “End-TB” strategy were mostly not achieved worldwide due to rise in TB deaths and slowing of TB incidence decline [2]. Understanding the natural history of MTB infection should precede effective strategies for successful eradication of MTB. Individuals infected with MTB exhibit different clinical outcomes, depending on the interaction between MTB and host immunity [4,5]. Most of them successfully contain MTB and maintain the status of latent infection using an effective immune response, which is the so-called latent TB infection (LTBI) [4-6]. Individuals with LTBI, accounting for approximately one-fourth of the world’s population [7,8], represent a potential reservoir for active TB because a disrupted equilibrium between MTB and host immunity may cause progression to active TB in 10% of them during their lifetime [9]. Thus, to achieve the goal of the “End-TB” strategy, early identification and treatment of both active TB and LTBI at a high-risk of progression to active TB is clearly critical.
Recent evidence suggests that there is no clear distinction between active TB and LTBI, and the clinical outcomes after MTB infection rather span a continuous spectrum (Figure 1) [9-12]. As there are different disease statuses of active TB, such as subclinical TB or symptomatic TB, LTBI also encompasses a heterogeneous range of infection status [13-15]. In particular, growing evidence indicates the importance of early detection of incipient TB, in which progression to active TB disease has begun but symptoms and radiographic abnormalities have not yet developed [11,16,17]. Individuals with incipient TB are likely to develop active TB within a short time and would benefit most from TB preventive therapy [16,17]. However, a validated test for predicting progression to active TB is not yet available. Recently, biomarker-based approaches including interferon-γ (IFN-γ) response of CD4/CD8 T-cell stimulated with additional MTB-specific peptides, T-cell phenotyping, proteomics, and transcriptomics, have led to incremental improvements in this field [11,18-22]. In particular, several mRNA signatures identified in blood transcriptomic studies have shown promise and are in the most advanced stages of development [22-29]. In this review, we discuss the recent progress and challenges in the field of host blood transcriptional signatures to identify predictive biomarkers for the progression to TB.

Currently Available Diagnostic Tests for LTBI

The diagnosis of LTBI is based on immunological evidence to MTB antigen using the tuberculin skin test (TST) or IFN-γ release assay (IGRA), which cannot differentiate between active TB and LTBI [5]. People with a positive TST or IGRA include those who are successfully cleared from MTB infection and those at high-risk of developing TB in the near future [30]. The positive predictive value (PPV) of TST and IGRA for the development of active TB within 2 years is estimated to be 1% to 4% and the number needed to treat (NNT) in preventing one active TB case is 67-250 for TST and 37-85 for IGRA [22,31-33]. Thus, the search for a novel biomarker that can reflect the heterogeneous status of LTBI on a continuous spectrum and predict risk for future development of TB is urgently necessary, and such biomarker-based TB preventive therapy would help reduce NNT and overcome barriers during implementation of TB preventive therapy [34]. In addition, a big challenge is that TST or IGRA remains positive after TB preventive therapy in individuals with LTBI. A novel test that can monitor the effect of TB preventive therapy will help advance interventions for TB control. In 2017, WHO announced the urgent need to develop a new test to detect the presence of incipient TB and provided target product profiles (TPP), including details on the minimum and optimal performance criteria of the relevant predictive tests for future risk over a specified duration of 2 years [16].

Host Transcriptional Signatures for Predicting Progression to Active TB

1. Basic principle

Gene expression is the process by which information stored in the DNA is converted into a functional product through transcription and translation [35]. Changes in mRNA expression, such as overexpression or underexpression of hundreds or thousands of genes, occur as a transcriptional response to different external stimuli in human pathophysiological conditions [35-37]. Simultaneous and systematic analysis of differentially expressed genes using microarray or RNA sequencing platforms has improved our understanding of the complex pathogenesis of various human diseases and the discovery of key genes with altered expression which may be potential biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of diseases [38]. This host transcriptional investigation has been adopted in infectious diseases and has allowed the simultaneous evaluation of complex interactions between the host and pathogen [35].
Various types of biological materials, including tissue specimens, cells, and blood samples, can be used for gene transcriptional profiling. Peripheral blood, which provides information about the cumulative host immune response throughout the entire body, is an easily accessible and reproducible sample for measuring gene expression [39]. Thus, blood-derived transcriptional analysis has been extensively studied in patients with infectious diseases, including TB [35,39]. Serial blood sampling may enable the tracing of dynamic changes in gene expression over time after infection [37].
Although infectious diseases are generally diagnosed via the detection of pathogens, direct pathogen detection is not always feasible in individuals with different statuses of MTB infection on a continuous spectrum. Given that blood-based host RNA signatures would be reflective of disease state, a consequence of dynamic changes in the immunological equilibrium between MTB and the host, recent clinical studies have focused on a transcriptomic approach for the development of novel TB diagnostic tests (Figure 1) [35]. This approach may be more helpful in diagnosing incipient or subclinical TB, in which MTB detection is more challenging owing to a paucibacillary state, as opposed to symptomatic active TB.

2. Overview of transcriptomic studies for the prediction of progression to active TB

The first large-scale blood transcriptomic study by Berry et al. [40] was heralded as a breakthrough discovery of a promising biomarker for the diagnosis of active TB. They identified a distinct 393-transcript signature dominated by interferon inducible genes from the whole blood of patients with active TB and a subset of individuals with LTBI. The possibility that a blood transcriptional signature may identify incipient TB has been suggested [40]. This study was followed by the extended application of the transcriptomic approach in predicting future incident TB and treatment response monitoring [41-44]. Recent major studies focusing on the blood transcriptome of individuals at high-risk of future development of TB, the population of interest for this review, are summarized in Table 1. The ultimate aim of these studies was to develop a novel blood mRNA signature for the prediction of future TB development and validate its efficacy in different settings.
In the first stage, candidate TB risk signatures are determined by mining enormous gene expression profiles generated through high-throughput platforms (RNA sequencing or microarray) in a large prospective cohort of individuals with LTBI or a nested case-control study population [23,24]. The RNA signatures identified in the first stage are tested and validated in independent settings using a more targeted quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) platform [23,24]. Using this strategy, the Zak16 signature (comprised of 16-transcripts: ANKRD22, APLO1, BATF2, ETV7, FCGR1A, FCGR1B, GBP1, GBP2, GBP4, GBP5, SCARF1, SEPT4, SERPING1, STAT1, TAP1, and TRAFD1) was identified in the South African non-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) adolescent LTBI cohorts. The qRT-PCR based Zak16 signature was independently validated in South African and Gambian non-HIV adult household contact cohorts showing promising performance in predicting TB progression (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.72) 12 months preceding TB diagnosis [23]. However, the sensitivity of the Zak16 signature decreased as the time interval before active TB diagnosis increased. A subsequent study conducted in African non-HIV adult household contact cohorts found a novel RISK4 (also known as Suliman4) signature (two upregulated genes, GAS6 and SEPT4 and two downregulated genes, CD1C and BLK) with a modest AUC of 0.66 for TB progression 12 months prior to diagnosis. The AUC was comparatively lower because probably patients who developed active TB within 3 months of enrollment were excluded from the analysis [24].
Another way to develop predictive novel RNA signatures is to use candidate gene signatures previously identified for the diagnosis of active TB, and test or evaluate its performance for the detection of incipient TB in the combined transcriptomic datasets derived from previously published studies or independent cohorts. Significant gene signatures validated or discovered by this approach included BATF2, Roe3, Sweeney3, Gliddon3, Suliman4, and other signatures (Table 1) [25,26]. As opposed to studies of Zak16 and RISK4 signatures to assess diagnostic performance for up to 24 months before TB diagnosis, Roe3 signature was focused on the short-term risk of progression to TB. Although there was a low frequency of progression to TB in the HIV-negative UK TB contacts cohort, the study demonstrated that the Roe3 signature provided a higher PPV for progression to TB than the IGRA (up to 50% vs. 5.6%), suggesting a promising role of blood gene signatures for short-term risk stratification of TB contracts [26]. Similarly, a systematic review identified eight RNA signatures (BATF2, Gliddon3, Kaforou25, Roe3, Suliman2, Suliman4, Sweeney3, and Zak16) with equivalent diagnostic performance for incipient TB over 24 months (AUC, 0.70 to 0.77) and revealed that their performance improved as the time interval before the onset of TB decreased [25].
Despite encouraging results in these studies, whether the implementation of TB preventive therapy in the blood RNA transcript-guided target population would efficiently reduce incident TB is highly important. In this regard, a recent randomized controlled study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of the RISK11 signature (a simplified 11-gene signature derived from the Zak16 signature)-based TB preventive therapy in HIV-negative community settings in South Africa [27]. Unfortunately, RISK11 signature-based TB preventive therapy with once-weekly doses of isoniazid and rifapentine for 3 months (3HP) failed to reduce TB incidence over 15 months. The possibility that the 3HP regimen was insufficient to sterilize incipient TB detected using this strategy was suggested [27].
Although none of the blood gene signatures hitherto achieved the minimum criteria of the WHO TPP for predicting incident TB within 2 years prior to diagnosis, a promising role for short-term risk prediction was consistently observed (AUC >0.95) [26,27]. The latest headto-head comparison study using eight parsimonious blood transcriptomic signatures (Francisco2, DIAG4, RISK6, RISK4, BATF2, Roe3, Sweeney3, and Thompson5) and RISK11 reaffirmed this finding [45]. Most of the eight RNA signatures met the minimal WHO target criteria within 6 months prior to TB diagnosis. In particular, the RISK11 signature achieved the optimal target criteria for predicting TB progression over 6 months.
Additionally, the predictive performance of the blood transcriptional signature for incident TB did not decline in people living with HIV (PLHIV) [28]. Thus, the application of community-based transcriptomic testing once or twice a year would be feasible as a TB preventive strategy for PLHIV in areas with high TB prevalence [28].
Finally, efforts to develop a point-of-care testing platform with more refined transcriptomic signatures have already been done, although studies have mostly been conducted in terms of a triage or a diagnostic test for active TB, rather than an incipient TB test [29,42]. A recent study using the Cepheid MTB Host Response cartridge with fingerpricked blood samples, applying the Sweeney3-gene signature, showed promising performance as a point-of-care triage test for active TB [29]. TB score based on mRNA expression of three genes (GBP5, DUSP3, and KLF2) discriminated between active TB and other respiratory diseases with an AUC of 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91 to 0.97) when evaluated against GeneXpert Ultra (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). When the sensitivity was set at 90% for the triage test, the specificity was 86% (95% CI, 75% to 97%). The results were not influenced by the geographic area or HIV infection status. These interim data reached the WHO minimal TPP for a point-of-care triage test for TB, although this study was conducted in adult patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of TB with a small sample size and subgroups. However, early gene expression changes during infection progression prior to the development of active TB may be subtle compared with those in overt active TB. Thus, the performance of the gene signature in predicting TB progression is likely less accurate than that in discriminating between individuals with active TB and healthy controls or those with other respiratory diseases.

3. Challenges

Most studies were performed in specific regions, such as Africa and the UK. The performance of the signature derived from a cohort was different when applied to other cohorts, suggesting heterogeneity in gene expression across different populations [24,42]. Thus, these performances need to be validated by testing the generalized population with variable genetic backgrounds, diverse strains of MTB, and different environmental exposures [18,42]. Furthermore, transcriptional signatures can also be affected by individual characteristics such as age, immunosuppressive condition, and other comorbidities. Therefore, further assessment of these potential confounding factors is required for identifying a universal signature [25,26].
All studies showed that the predictive performance declined with increasing time intervals prior to disease development. Thus, transcriptomic biomarkers reflect short-term risk of TB [25,42]. These limitations may lead to consideration of an optimal testing strategy during the potential risk period, such as the current follow-up strategy for lung nodules. In the context of existing evidence, serial testing among selected high-risk groups may be necessary [25].
To facilitate the implementation of novel RNA signatures as point-of-care tests, many steps are required. These barriers include a small number of target transcriptional genes, technical issues involved in RNA extraction, RT-PCR, platform development of selected signature gene transcripts, and low cost [24,42].
Finally, gene signature-guided TB preventive therapy resulted in an insufficient reduction in the development of incident TB [27], although the weekly 3HP regimen adopted in that study was an effective one endorsed by the WHO. If a gene expression signature predicts incipient TB, individuals with such gene expression may have a greater mycobacterial burden or have different metabolic states compared to those with general LTBI detected by IGRA. Thus, existing preventive regimens may not be effective under these altered circumstances. Further research is required to evaluate whether the current TB preventive therapy is appropriate for the management of individuals targeted by predictive blood RNA signatures.


We have briefly summarized the recent progress in the blood transcriptomic approach in terms of risk prediction for future progression to TB. The performance of novel RNA signatures for the prediction of incident TB within 2 years was more modest than expected. However, some signatures showed convincing accuracy in predicting short-term risk for 3 to 6 months. If an easy-to-use platform to detect these RNA signatures is developed, its periodic testing every 3 to 6 months can be adopted during the period over which a significant risk of progression to TB exists. Further studies are required to evaluate whether currently available TB preventive therapy regimens are effective in reducing TB incidence in individuals based on gene signatures or whether relevant RNA expression returns to normal levels after completion of TB preventive therapy. Recent advances have been made in TB detection technology using non-sputum samples, such as the Xpert MTB Host Response prototype. Now, we are looking forward to developing a novel host blood gene-based predictive test that can change LTBI management strategies in the near future.


Authors’ Contributions

Conceptualization: Kim CH, Lee J. Methodology: Kim CH, Choi G, Lee J. Investigation: Kim CH, Lee J. Writing-original draft preparation: Kim CH, Choi G. Writing-review and editing: Lee J. Approval of final manuscript: all authors.

Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.


No funding to declare.

Fig. 1.
Host blood transcriptomic approach in individuals with latent tuberculosis (TB) infection on a continuous spectrum carrying heterogeneous risk levels for progression to active TB. TST: tuberculin skin test; IGRA: interferon-γ release assay.
Table 1.
Summary of recent studies on blood transcriptional mRNA signatures for the prediction of progression to active tuberculosis
Study Target gene signatures Study population Performance, AUC (95% CI)/time interval prior to diagnosis Achievement of performance criteria based on the WHO TPP Study design
Zak et al. [23] (2016) Zak16 South African adolescent latent TB cohort (ACS), South African and Gambian household contacts (GC6-74) 0.72 (0.64-0.80) to 0.78 (0.76-0.80)/12 mo None Prospective cohort study
Suliman et al. [24] (2018) RISK4 GC6-74, ACS 0.66 (0.55-0.78)/12 mo None Case-control study
0.69 (0.51-0.86)/12-24 mo
Roe et al. [26] (2020) Roe3 UK TB contacts 0.96 (0.92-1.0)/3 mo 0.70 (0.64-0.76) to NA Preexisting dataset plus new cohort data
Gupta et al. [25] (2020) BATF2, Roe3, Sweeney3, Gliddon3, Suliman2, Suliman4, Zak16, Kaforou25 ACS, GC6-74, UK TB contacts 0.77 (0.71-0.82)/24 mo None (except Sweeney3 [3 mominimum]) Pooled dataset from published studies
Scriba et al. [27] (2021) RISK11 South African community setting 0.63 (0.47-0.80)/15 mo None (except 6 mooptimum & 12 mominimum) Prospective RCT
Mendelsohn et al. [28] (2021) RISK11 South African community setting (HIV) 0.80 (0.71-0.87)/15 mo None Prospective cohort study

AUC: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; CI: confidence interval; WHO: World Health Organization; TPP: target product profile; TB: tuberculosis; ACS: adolescent cohort study; GC6-74: Grand Challenges 6-74 study; NA: not applicable; RCT: randomized controlled trial; HIV: human immunodeficiency virus.


1. Comas I, Coscolla M, Luo T, Borrell S, Holt KE, Kato-Maeda M, et al. Out-of-Africa migration and Neolithic coexpansion of Mycobacterium tuberculosis with modern humans. Nat Genet 2013;45:1176-82.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
2. World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2021 [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021 [cited 2023 Feb 9]. Available from:

3. Furin J, Cox H, Pai M. Tuberculosis. Lancet 2019;393:1642-56.
crossref pmid
4. Simmons JD, Stein CM, Seshadri C, Campo M, Alter G, Fortune S, et al. Immunological mechanisms of human resistance to persistent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Nat Rev Immunol 2018;18:575-89.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
5. Getahun H, Matteelli A, Chaisson RE, Raviglione M. Latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. N Engl J Med 2015;372:2127-35.
crossref pmid
6. Mack U, Migliori GB, Sester M, Rieder HL, Ehlers S, Goletti D, et al. LTBI: latent tuberculosis infection or lasting immune responses to M. tuberculosis? A TBNET consensus statement. Eur Respir J 2009;33:956-73.
crossref pmid
7. Houben RM, Dodd PJ. The global burden of latent tuberculosis infection: a re-estimation using mathematical modelling. PLoS Med 2016;13:e1002152.
crossref pmid pmc
8. Dye C, Scheele S, Dolin P, Pathania V, Raviglione MC. Consensus statement: global burden of tuberculosis: estimated incidence, prevalence, and mortality by country. JAMA 1999;282:677-86.
crossref pmid
9. Esmail H, Barry CE, Young DB, Wilkinson RJ. The ongoing challenge of latent tuberculosis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2014;369:20130437.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
10. Esmail H, Lai RP, Lesosky M, Wilkinson KA, Graham CM, Coussens AK, et al. Characterization of progressive HIV-associated tuberculosis using 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission and computed tomography. Nat Med 2016;22:1090-3.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
11. Drain PK, Bajema KL, Dowdy D, Dheda K, Naidoo K, Schumacher SG, et al. Incipient and subclinical tuberculosis: a clinical review of early stages and progression of infection. Clin Microbiol Rev 2018;31:e00021. -18.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
12. Pai M, Behr MA, Dowdy D, Dheda K, Divangahi M, Boehme CC, et al. Tuberculosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2016;2:16076.
crossref pmid pdf
13. Lin PL, Flynn JL. Understanding latent tuberculosis: a moving target. J Immunol 2010;185:15-22.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
14. Lau A, Lin C, Barrie J, Winter C, Armstrong G, Egedahl ML, et al. The radiographic and mycobacteriologic correlates of subclinical pulmonary TB in Canada: a retrospective cohort study. Chest 2022;162:309-20.
crossref pmid
15. Barry CE, Boshoff HI, Dartois V, Dick T, Ehrt S, Flynn J, et al. The spectrum of latent tuberculosis: rethinking the biology and intervention strategies. Nat Rev Microbiol 2009;7:845-55.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
16. World Health Organization. Development of a target product profile (TPP) and a framework for evaluation for a test for predicting progression from tuberculosis infection to active disease [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017 [cited 2023 Feb 9]. Available from:

17. Getahun H, Matteelli A, Abubakar I, Hauer B, Pontali E, Migliori GB. Advancing global programmatic management of latent tuberculosis infection for at risk populations. Eur Respir J 2016;47:1327-30.
crossref pmid
18. Schumacher SG, Denkinger CM. Diagnostic test for incipient tuberculosis: a step forward, many more to go. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2018;197:1106-7.
crossref pmid
19. Nikolova M, Markova R, Drenska R, Muhtarova M, Todorova Y, Dimitrov V, et al. Antigen-specific CD4- and CD8-positive signatures in different phases of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2013;75:277-81.
crossref pmid
20. Halliday A, Whitworth H, Kottoor SH, Niazi U, Menzies S, Kunst H, et al. Stratification of latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection by cellular immune profiling. J Infect Dis 2017;215:1480-7.
crossref pmid pmc
21. Mpande CA, Musvosvi M, Rozot V, Mosito B, Reid TD, Schreuder C, et al. Antigen-specific T-cell activation distinguishes between recent and remote tuberculosis infection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2021;203:1556-65.
crossref pmid pmc
22. Petruccioli E, Scriba TJ, Petrone L, Hatherill M, Cirillo DM, Joosten SA, et al. Correlates of tuberculosis risk: predictive biomarkers for progression to active tuberculosis. Eur Respir J 2016;48:1751-63.
crossref pmid pmc
23. Zak DE, Penn-Nicholson A, Scriba TJ, Thompson E, Suliman S, Amon LM, et al. A blood RNA signature for tuberculosis disease risk: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 2016;387:2312-22.
crossref pmid pmc
24. Suliman S, Thompson EG, Sutherland J, Weiner J, Ota MO, Shankar S, et al. Four-gene pan-African blood signature predicts progression to tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2018;197:1198-208.
pmid pmc
25. Gupta RK, Turner CT, Venturini C, Esmail H, Rangaka MX, Copas A, et al. Concise whole blood transcriptional signatures for incipient tuberculosis: a systematic review and patient-level pooled meta-analysis. Lancet Respir Med 2020;8:395-406.
crossref pmid pmc
26. Roe J, Venturini C, Gupta RK, Gurry C, Chain BM, Sun Y, et al. Blood transcriptomic stratification of short-term risk in contacts of tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis 2020;70:731-7.
crossref pmid pdf
27. Scriba TJ, Fiore-Gartland A, Penn-Nicholson A, Mulenga H, Kimbung Mbandi S, Borate B, et al. Biomarker-guided tuberculosis preventive therapy (CORTIS): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis 2021;21:354-65.
pmid pmc
28. Mendelsohn SC, Fiore-Gartland A, Penn-Nicholson A, Mulenga H, Mbandi SK, Borate B, et al. Validation of a host blood transcriptomic biomarker for pulmonary tuberculosis in people living with HIV: a prospective diagnostic and prognostic accuracy study. Lancet Glob Health 2021;9:e841-53.
pmid pmc
29. Sutherland JS, van der Spuy G, Gindeh A, Thuong NT, Namuganga A, Owolabi O, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the cepheid 3-gene host response fingerstick blood test in a prospective, multi-site study: interim results. Clin Infect Dis 2022;74:2136-41.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
30. Singhania A, Wilkinson RJ, Rodrigue M, Haldar P, O’Garra A. The value of transcriptomics in advancing knowledge of the immune response and diagnosis in tuberculosis. Nat Immunol 2018;19:1159-68.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
31. Abubakar I, Drobniewski F, Southern J, Sitch AJ, Jackson C, Lipman M, et al. Prognostic value of interferon-γ release assays and tuberculin skin test in predicting the development of active tuberculosis (UK PREDICT TB): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 2018;18:1077-87.
pmid pmc
32. Zellweger JP, Sotgiu G, Block M, Dore S, Altet N, Blunschi R, et al. Risk assessment of tuberculosis in contacts by IFN-γ release assays: a Tuberculosis Network European Trials Group study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015;191:1176-84.
crossref pmid
33. Diel R, Loddenkemper R, Nienhaus A. Predictive value of interferon-γ release assays and tuberculin skin testing for progression from latent TB infection to disease state: a meta-analysis. Chest 2012;142:63-75.
crossref pmid
34. Sumner T, Scriba TJ, Penn-Nicholson A, Hatherill M, White RG. Potential population level impact on tuberculosis incidence of using an mRNA expression signature correlate-of-risk test to target tuberculosis preventive therapy. Sci Rep 2019;9:11126.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
35. Gliddon HD, Herberg JA, Levin M, Kaforou M. Genome-wide host RNA signatures of infectious diseases: discovery and clinical translation. Immunology 2018;153:171-8.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
36. Golub TR, Slonim DK, Tamayo P, Huard C, Gaasenbeek M, Mesirov JP, et al. Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. Science 1999;286:531-7.
crossref pmid
37. Chaussabel D, Pascual V, Banchereau J. Assessing the human immune system through blood transcriptomics. BMC Biol 2010;8:84.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
38. Casamassimi A, Federico A, Rienzo M, Esposito S, Ciccodicola A. Transcriptome profiling in human diseases: new advances and perspectives. Int J Mol Sci 2017;18:1652.
crossref pmid pmc
39. Blankley S, Berry MP, Graham CM, Bloom CI, Lipman M, O’Garra A. The application of transcriptional blood signatures to enhance our understanding of the host response to infection: the example of tuberculosis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2014;369:20130427.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
40. Berry MP, Graham CM, McNab FW, Xu Z, Bloch SA, Oni T, et al. An interferon-inducible neutrophil-driven blood transcriptional signature in human tuberculosis. Nature 2010;466:973-7.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
41. Walzl G, McNerney R, du Plessis N, Bates M, McHugh TD, Chegou NN, et al. Tuberculosis: advances and challenges in development of new diagnostics and biomarkers. Lancet Infect Dis 2018;18:e199-210.
crossref pmid
42. Hamada Y, Penn-Nicholson A, Krishnan S, Cirillo DM, Matteelli A, Wyss R, et al. Are mRNA based transcriptomic signatures ready for diagnosing tuberculosis in the clinic? A review of evidence and the technological landscape. EBioMedicine 2022;82:104174.
crossref pmid pmc
43. Anderson ST, Kaforou M, Brent AJ, Wright VJ, Banwell CM, Chagaluka G, et al. Diagnosis of childhood tuberculosis and host RNA expression in Africa. N Engl J Med 2014;370:1712-23.
crossref pmid pmc
44. Sweeney TE, Braviak L, Tato CM, Khatri P. Genome-wide expression for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis: a multicohort analysis. Lancet Respir Med 2016;4:213-24.
crossref pmid pmc
45. Mendelsohn SC, Mbandi SK, Fiore - Gartland A, Penn-Nicholson A, Musvosvi M, Mulenga H, et al. Prospective multicentre head-to-head validation of host blood transcriptomic biomarkers for pulmonary tuberculosis by real-time PCR. Commun Med (Lond) 2022;2:26.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
METRICS Graph View
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
  • 2 Scopus
  • 2,695 View
  • 232 Download

Chang Ho Kim

Gahye Choi

Jaehee Lee

Related articles

Article category

Browse all articles >


Browse all articles >

Editorial Office
101-605, 58, Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu (Seocho-dong, Seocho Art-Xi), Seoul 06652, Korea
Tel: +82-2-575-3825, +82-2-576-5347    Fax: +82-2-572-6683    E-mail:                

Copyright © 2024 by The Korean Academy of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases. All rights reserved.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next